State Report Card^®

Newborn screening (NBS) is one of the most successful public health programs ever enacted, saving thousands of lives each year. Newborn screening allows physicians to catch a heritable disease early and start treatment almost immediately following birth. As a result, many of the worst effects of a disease can be mitigated.

Newborn screening programs are regulated and operated almost entirely at the state level, allowing customization of a program to the state’s specific needs. NORD encourages every state to adopt the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) developed by the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.

State Processes for Adding New Conditions

A state’s support for its NBS labs (including funding for personnel and new tests) is critically important. The process by which states add new conditions to their program is incredibly important as well. These aspects have a big impact on the success of a state’s program.

Storage and Research Uses of Dried Blood Spots Used in NBS

The primary tool of NBS, the dried blood spots (DBS) drawn from a baby’s heel shortly after birth, is an invaluable source of research data. Currently, numerous states do not have a policy for retaining DBS after its use in screening to be de-identified and used in research. NORD strongly believes that states should retain DBS for use in research. Research of DBS is critical to developing additional newborn screening tests that can save lives.

Innovative new treatments are enabling rare disease patients to live healthier, happier lives. Unfortunately, however, the cost of these medicines can often be prohibitive. NORD recognizes that the high cost of drugs has a direct impact on patient access. Addressing this and other barriers to care is a priority for NORD. Further, we acknowledge the immense pressure that payers are
under to control costs for the sake of all beneficiaries. Yet we do not believe that attempts to redress rising costs should come at the detriment of patients. Failing to support patients today, who are in need of immediate assistance to pay for their prescribed treatment, could have a negative impact on their health.

To assist patients who find themselves in this difficult situation, several states have passed legislation mandating a limit on out-of-pocket costs for medications. These limits can be applied in different forms, such as a per-drug cap or by mandating a copay-only structure in certain health plans.

In 2012, the Supreme Court decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius enabled states to choose whether or not to expand the financial eligibility for their Medicaid program. Since the decision, a growing number of states have decided to expand their Medicaid programs to cover all individuals at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). States that have opted not to expand their eligibility have left approximately 5 million Americans without health insurance who would otherwise be eligible for Medicaid coverage.

The State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) is an important source of health coverage for children and families that are ineligible for traditional Medicaid. All states provide increased coverage for children and families through CHIP but may operate the program slightly differently. For example, some states use the federal funding for CHIP to expand their Medicaid program to reach this target population (this is sometimes referred to as “CHIP-funded eligibility”). Other states use these funds to operate a separate CHIP program that provides separate coverage from their Medicaid program.

Medicaid 1115 Waivers

In an attempt to control health care costs and improve services for Medicaid beneficiaries, states have sought Section 1115 waivers that enable them to make substantial changes to Medicaid benefits and eligibility. Section 1115 waivers allow states to administer demonstration projects that have been approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). These projects waive certain Medicaid requirements and permit a state to direct federal Medicaid funds in ways that would otherwise not be permitted under federal law. These waivers are supposed to align with the objectives of the Medicaid program, but NORD is concerned that several of the current state proposals would restructure Medicaid benefits and eligibility in a way that undermines the purpose of the program and disproportionately affects people with rare diseases.

Step therapy (a.k.a. Fail First) is a procedure by which insurers (public or private) require a patient to take one or more alternative medications before being put on the medicine preferred by their provider. While this is done by insurers as an attempt to control health care costs, step therapy has been increasingly applied to patients with little regard to their medical situation or treatment history. As a result, in many cases step requirements can delay appropriate treatment and ultimately increase costs, not lower them.

NORD supports state efforts to place adequate patient protections around the use of step therapy that will ensure patients are protected.

Addressing the needs of rare disease community begins with ensuring that patients and their caregivers have a voice in government. Several states have recognized this and worked with local advocates to create new Rare Disease Advisory Councils (aka a Task Force or Commission).

The purpose of these councils is to evaluate and make recommendations to the state on issues related to health care access and coverage for rare disease patients, as well as disseminating information on specific rare diseases.

Ultimately, NORD believes that the establishment of a focused rare disease advisory council can help pave the way for better health care policy in a given state.